🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."